[OE-core] [PATCH] libxml2: add shared library version info to libxml shared libraries

[Martin Jansa]

On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 04:21:16PM +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 12:22:28AM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 04:05:16PM -0600, Matthew McClintock wrote:
> >> > This fixes an issue with RPM where it checks version imformation for
> >> > binaries linked against libxml and fails because it's missing info
> >> >
> >> > | error: Failed dependencies:
> >> > |              libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.6.0) is needed by fmc-0.9.7+2-r2.1.ppce500mc
> >> > |              libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.4.30) is needed by fmc-0.9.7+2-r2.1.ppce500mc
> >> > | ERROR: Function 'do_rootfs' failed (see
> >> >
> >> > Note: fmc is just an example recipe/name
> >>
> >> Weird that I haven't noticed this in oe-core before, but probably
> >> because in oe-core it was always without version. But it looks the same
> >> as this
> >> http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded/commit/?id=50ed401cdaaefb1f5ac33de2838af259a52b1c3a
> >> so
> 
> You won't see this when building against oe-core stuff from source.
> This issue is seen when we bring in a prebuilt binary and link against
> libxml2 in the system.

what about all binaries built before this change which are already
available in binary feed created with OE?
 
> >> Acked-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa at gmail.com>
> >
> > but also double check if all recipes depending on it needs PR bump too,
> > I've expected that it's needed only for transition from versioned to not
> > versioned symbols, but according to:
> > http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded/commit/?id=4373bc4d0cde98dfa188d9a06266afa06f970bfe
> > http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded/commit/?id=7e673ab79c7d76ffc2b733fb32d0b41514eb0db0
> > it was needed also other way around
> 
> Because of the reason above, I don't think we need to bump PR's for
> all these recipes. People just should not normally be seeing this
> issue. If they are well, then they won't be able to make an RPM based
> rfs (maybe others)
> 
> Let me know if that seems reasonable...
> 
> -M
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20120103/69037f66/attachment-0002.sig>