[OE-core] [PATCH] package bbclass: allow per package PRIVATE_LIBS

Richard Purdie richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org
Thu Jan 26 23:52:26 UTC 2012


On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 00:17 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 26 jan. 2012, om 21:51 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
> 
> > On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 18:03 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >> If a recipe packages multiple versions of shlib (e.g. powervr drivers) we only want the shlib code to pickup $PN, not $PN-foo subpackages.
> >> This keeps backward compatibility with the global PRIVATE_LIBS usage if no per package PRIVATE_LIBS are set for a given package. In other words: this doesn't break the firefox recipe.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net>
> >> ---
> >> meta/classes/package.bbclass |    5 ++++-
> >> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/meta/classes/package.bbclass b/meta/classes/package.bbclass
> >> index 45447e3..22a76cf 100644
> >> --- a/meta/classes/package.bbclass
> >> +++ b/meta/classes/package.bbclass
> >> @@ -1246,7 +1246,8 @@ python package_do_shlibs() {
> >> 				if not this_soname in sonames:
> >> 					# if library is private (only used by package) then do not build shlib for it
> >> 					if not private_libs or -1 == private_libs.find(this_soname):
> >> -						sonames.append(this_soname)
> >> +						if not private_libs_pkg or -1 == private_libs_pkg.find(this_soname):
> >> +							sonames.append(this_soname)
> >> 				if libdir_re.match(root):
> >> 					needs_ldconfig = True
> >> 				if snap_symlinks and (file != this_soname):
> >> @@ -1328,6 +1329,8 @@ python package_do_shlibs() {
> >> 	shlib_provider = {}
> >> 	private_libs = d.getVar('PRIVATE_LIBS', True)
> >> 	for pkg in packages.split():
> >> +		if not private_libs:
> >> +			private_libs_pkg = d.getVar('PRIVATE_LIBS_' + pkg, True)
> > 
> > You might as well just put:
> > 
> >                         private_libs = d.getVar('PRIVATE_LIBS_' + pkg, True)
> > 
> > and drop the first bit of the patch.
> 
> Wouldn't that kill backward compatibility?

No, since it would only take effect if the plain PRIVATE_LIBS was not
set...

Cheers,

Richard






More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list