[OE-core] [PATCH] sstate.bbclass: consider postinstall dependencies too
Burton, Ross
ross.burton at intel.com
Mon Mar 4 11:16:51 UTC 2013
On 4 March 2013 11:13, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm hoping we only have very small list of these problematic
>> dependencies. If we end up with a large number of them then yes, we'd
>> need to abstract it but I'd prefer to avoid that unless proven
>> necessary.
>>
>> Is there a specific case you have in mind?
>
> Isn't systemd-systemctl-native another candidate to be included?
Yes, it is.
Ross
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list