[OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] systemd: Package hwdb data

[Khem Raj]

On Mar 11, 2013, at 7:00 AM, Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:

> 
> Op 10 mrt. 2013, om 00:54 heeft Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
> 
>> Create a new package to hold the hwdb.d
>> Fixes the packaging warning as well.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>
>> ---
>> meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_198.bb |    4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_198.bb b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_198.bb
>> index 381a67b..9fc4704 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_198.bb
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_198.bb
>> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ python populate_packages_prepend (){
>> }
>> PACKAGES_DYNAMIC += "^lib(udev|gudev|systemd).*"
>> 
>> -PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-gui ${PN}-vconsole-setup ${PN}-initramfs ${PN}-analyze"
>> +PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-gui ${PN}-vconsole-setup ${PN}-initramfs ${PN}-analyze ${PN}-hwdb"
>> 
>> USERADD_PACKAGES = "${PN}"
>> GROUPADD_PARAM_${PN} = "-r lock"
>> @@ -168,6 +168,8 @@ FILES_${PN} = " ${base_bindir}/* \
>>                /lib/udev/rules.d/99-systemd.rules \
>>               "
>> 
>> +FILES_${PN}-hwdb = "/lib/udev/hwdb.d"
>> +
> 
> It's a udev hwdb, so calling it systemd-hwdb would be very misleading.

OK I had it called udev-hwdb until I thought otherwise and changed it

> And aren't you missing a RRECOMMENDS?

I think Ross already has this taken care of so this patch might be moot.