[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] classes/buildhistory: implement history collection for SDKs
Richard Purdie
richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org
Sat Mar 23 17:41:00 UTC 2013
On Sat, 2013-03-23 at 17:32 +0000, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Saturday 23 March 2013 16:05:20 Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 19:53 +0000, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > > SDKs are constructed in a similar manner to images, and the contents can
> > > be influenced by a number of different factors, thus tracking the
> > > contents of produced SDKs when buildhistory is enabled can help detect
> > > the same kinds of issues as with images.
> > >
> > > This required adding POPULATE_SDK_POST_HOST_COMMAND and
> > > SDK_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND variables so that data collection functions can
> > > be injected at the appropriate points in the SDK construction process,
> > > as well as moving the list_installed_packages and
> > > rootfs_list_installed_depends functions from the rootfs_{rpm,ipk,deb} to
> > > the package_{rpm,ipk,deb} classes so they can also be called during
> > > do_populate_sdk as well as do_rootfs.
> > >
> > > Implements [YOCTO #3964].
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > meta/classes/buildhistory.bbclass | 130
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++---------- meta/classes/package_deb.bbclass
> > > | 28 +++++++
> > > meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass | 24 ++++++
> > > meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass | 17 +++++
> > > meta/classes/populate_sdk_base.bbclass | 2 +
> > > meta/classes/populate_sdk_deb.bbclass | 1 +
> > > meta/classes/populate_sdk_ipk.bbclass | 2 +
> > > meta/classes/populate_sdk_rpm.bbclass | 1 +
> > > meta/classes/rootfs_deb.bbclass | 27 -------
> > > meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass | 22 ------
> > > meta/classes/rootfs_rpm.bbclass | 16 ----
> > > 11 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-)
> >
> > This broke all the builds. Try setting PACKAGE_CLASSES with multiple
> > entries. The order determines the exact breakage. The first class
> > inherited needs to "win" but with the overlapping function names, this
> > isn't the case.
>
> I will look into this this evening.
I realised there is a relatively easy way to fix this which I've pushed.
I'll run another build on the AB, see how things look.
Cheers,
Richard
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list