[OE-core] [yocto] Is there anyway to get patched source tar file for gcc while building srpm?

[lizhijian]

Jegan Chandru <pcjegan at ...> writes:

> 
> 
> <<bump>>
> Added poky and oe-core.
> 
> anyone?On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Jegan Chandru <pcjegan-
Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org> wrote:Hi,
> Framework - poky-denzil-7.0
> arch - x86_64
> 
> Is there anyway to get patched source tar file for gcc while building 
srpm? I have checked the srpms created and found gcc srpms has only the 
logs_with_scripts tar file and not the patched source. I have configured 
"archive-patched-source" in local.conf. Upon checking on archiver.bbclass, 
noticed "not_tarball" function is excluding work-shared dir.This dir is used 
by gcc only for building. I can see the obvious reason here that(correct me 
if I am wrong) since this source has been used by, say gcc-cross-
intermediate, gcc-cross-4.6.3 and gcc-runtime-4.6.3 bb files and you dont 
want to archive that source. But anyone can tell me the exact reason on why 
work-shared is being omitted for archiving? Also, I must include that, there 
are total 40 patches for gcc and all patches getting applied in gcc-4.6.inc. 
So I think there is no harm in archiving that source.
> 
> 
> 
> As a try and error, I have created a dummy function for not_tarball and 
tried to build, but that didnt work! ;(
> 
> So please anyone shed some light on this matter. It is much appreciated.
> 
> 
> I need srpm with source for stabilizing and do some testing.
> 
> Also there is a high chance that I missed something, so feel free to 
correct me. ;)
> 
> Thanks,
> -JC
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> poky mailing list
> poky at ...
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/poky
> 

I got the same issue. and before see your thread, i have sent a email
to yocto. Do you have solved it

thx
li.