[OE-core] [PATCH 23/61] package.bbclass: Fix support for private libs

[Armin Kuster]

From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com>

* n is a tuple since this commit:
  commit d3aa7668a9f001044d0a0f1ba2de425a36056102
  Author: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org>
  Date:   Mon Jul 7 18:41:23 2014 +0100
  Subject package.bbclass: Improve shlibs needed data structure

  since then 'n in private_libs' was always false and private libs
  were always processed
* this is bad when we have libfoo in private libs, but also some package
  providing libfoo, that way we ship own libfoo.so, but together with
  runtime dependency on package providing libfoo

(From OE-Core rev: ec1d379683cedca4be1c252475d02c8041227142)

Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa at gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808 at gmail.com>
---
 meta/classes/package.bbclass | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/meta/classes/package.bbclass b/meta/classes/package.bbclass
index 96d7fd9..4685cd2 100644
--- a/meta/classes/package.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/package.bbclass
@@ -1572,7 +1572,7 @@ python package_do_shlibs() {
             # /opt/abc/lib/libfoo.so.1 and contains /usr/bin/abc depending on system library libfoo.so.1
             # but skipping it is still better alternative than providing own
             # version and then adding runtime dependency for the same system library
-            if private_libs and n in private_libs:
+            if private_libs and n[0] in private_libs:
                 bb.debug(2, '%s: Dependency %s covered by PRIVATE_LIBS' % (pkg, n[0]))
                 continue
             if n[0] in shlib_provider.keys():
-- 
1.9.1