[OE-core] any value in keeping INITRAMFS_TASK?
Robert P. J. Day
rpjday at crashcourse.ca
Thu Feb 26 20:59:50 UTC 2015
just tripped over INITRAMFS_TASK in kernel.bbclass, which claims to
be only for backward compatibility and should be replaced by
INITRAMFS_IMAGE:
# NOTE: setting INITRAMFS_TASK is for backward compatibility
# The preferred method is to set INITRAMFS_IMAGE, because
# this INITRAMFS_TASK has circular dependency problems
# if the initramfs requires kernel modules
but i still see usage over in
meta-openembedded/meta-initramfs/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-tiny-kexecboot_3.1[07].bb:
INITRAMFS_IMAGE = "initramfs-kexecboot-klibc-image"
INITRAMFS_TASK = "${INITRAMFS_IMAGE}:do_rootfs"
should that be updated, and INITRAMFS_TASK tossed?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list