[OE-core] [PATCH] rpm: fix build issue with gcc5

[akuster808]

On 05/12/2015 12:06 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 23:03 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 09:15 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 7:28 AM, Armin Kuster <akuster808 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> | tset.o:(.debug_loc+0xe8): undefined reference to `.LCL0'
>>>> | tset.o:(.debug_loc+0xf7): undefined reference to `.LCL0'
>>>>
>>>> thanks Khem
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808 at gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb | 3 +++
>>>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb
>>>> index 03a24f0..22b111a 100644
>>>> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb
>>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb
>>>> @@ -110,6 +110,9 @@ inherit autotools gettext
>>>>
>>>>   acpaths = "-I ${S}/db/dist/aclocal -I ${S}/db/dist/aclocal_java"
>>>>
>>>> +FULL_OPTIMIZATION_powerpc_remove = "-O2"
>>>> +FULL_OPTIMIZATION_append_powerpc = " -Os "
>>>> +
>>>
>>> http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/commit/?h=kraj/master&id=741d3bf91144973d26de647039fa60b87a09edf1
>>> fixes same issue for libx11
>>>
>>> I am wondering if we should make this change in some common config
>>> metadata file to list all recipes that need this workaround
>>> untill gcc is fixed for it may be arch-powerpc.inc, since then it will
>>> be easy to remember to unbolt them once gcc is fixed.
>>
>> I like the idea of a common include to handle this a lot better.
>>
>> FWIW, I tried gcc 5 on the autobuilder. The results were 141 failures so
>> far:
>>
>> http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Search/?items=10&query=1426e31f0bcd19f066931d2ecbdec3752b14e88e&limit=150
>
> With the gcc patch I've posted applied:
>
> http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Search/?items=10&query=5fd0b7c163f4f3312bea9bd3246a6bd67a8da594&limit=100
>
> so down to 57 errors. There are a few themes:
>
> * linux-yocto 3.14 gcc5 issues
> * meta-fsl-ppc and metafsl-arm gcc5 issues, particularly kernel
> * poky-lsb issues with the security flags and gcc5
> * x32 failed with a race of some kind in glibc, suspect transient
> * gcc-target has a packaging issue which fails builds (have patch)
>
> The good news is that the various ppc issues are fixed including the rpm
> one from this series.
>

Have you tried arm64?

kernel did not build ( as of last week) and I have not yet tried the 
kernel patches Khem pointed out.

- armin

> Ross: The backports we were looking at are for warnings, not errors on
> the most part.
>
> Otavio: Could you see what our options are with meta-fsl-ppc and
> metafsl-arm?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
>