[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] package_manager.py: fix RPM_PREFER_ELF_ARCH for mips
Mark Hatle
mark.hatle at windriver.com
Mon Nov 23 14:20:05 UTC 2015
On 11/23/15 7:41 AM, Robert Yang wrote:
> We can install 64 bit pkg to 32 bit pkg, so the previous checking is
> incorrect, it should not only check mips64 or mips64el, the "mips"
> should work, and 64bit ELF can also use mips as TUNE_ARCH, and there
> are other mips varieties, so only check whether TUNE_ARCH starts with
> mips or not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang at windriver.com>
> ---
> meta/lib/oe/package_manager.py | 9 ++++-----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/package_manager.py b/meta/lib/oe/package_manager.py
> index 964fddc..5e7bb66 100644
> --- a/meta/lib/oe/package_manager.py
> +++ b/meta/lib/oe/package_manager.py
> @@ -954,12 +954,11 @@ class RpmPM(PackageManager):
> bb.fatal("Invalid RPM_PREFER_ELF_ARCH: %s, it should be one of:\n"
> "\t1: ELF32 wins\n"
> "\t2: ELF64 wins\n"
> - "\t4: ELF64 N32 wins (mips64 or mips64el only)" %
> + "\t4: ELF64 N32 wins (mips only)" %
N32 is only available on a MIPS64 platform. It requires MIPS64 instructions,
which is why it is documented as such above.
> prefer_color)
> - if prefer_color == "4" and self.d.getVar("TUNE_ARCH", True) not in \
> - ['mips64', 'mips64el']:
> - bb.fatal("RPM_PREFER_ELF_ARCH = \"4\" is for mips64 or mips64el "
> - "only.")
> + if prefer_color == "4" and not \
> + self.d.getVar("TUNE_ARCH", True).startswith('mips'):
> + bb.fatal("RPM_PREFER_ELF_ARCH = \"4\" is for mips only.")
The bug is that it's looking for TUNE_ARCH, it should be MACHINE_ARCH in this
case. Since the overall MACHINE Is what defined if it can be used or not.
--Mark
> self._invoke_smart('config --set rpm-extra-macros._prefer_color=%s'
> % prefer_color)
>
>
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list