[OE-core] [jethro][PATCH] license.bbclass: fix host contamination warnings for license files

[Martin Jansa]

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 04:25:56PM +0530, Jagadeesh Krishnanjanappa wrote:
> Hi Robert,
> 
> I understand. Though LICENSE_CREATE_PACKAGE is disabled by default in
> OE-core, if some users want to create ${PN}-lic package for each recipe
> via LICENSE_CREATE_PACKAGE = "1", then they are going to have host
> contamination  warnings for each recipe.
> 
> The above commit indicated by Martin does create ${PN}-lic package when
> LICENSE_CREATE_PACKAGE = "1".
> 
> Regards,
> Jagadeesh
> 
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 04:42:57PM +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Jagadeesh,
> > >
> > > Thanks, usually, patch should go into master branch before go into stable
> > > branch such as jethro. IMHO, jethro branch may not take this fix even if
> > > master merges it. The problem is that oe-core doesn't create package for
> > > ${PN}-lic atm, this patch is treated as part of the enhancement which is
> > > used for working with creating ${PN}-lic.
> >
> > Why do you think it isn't able to create ${PN}-lic when configured to do
> > so?
> >
> > commit dc78ef91a2bf01efb8028c9afbe69e506e016265
> > Author: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com>
> > Date:   Thu Jan 17 12:49:44 2013 +0100
> >
> >     license.bbclass: package license texts to PN-lic when
> > LICENSE_CREATE_PACKAGE is enabled
> >
> > is already in dylan release.
> >
> > > // Robert
> > >
> > > On 11/25/2015 02:54 PM, Jagadeesh Krishnanjanappa wrote:
> > > > We get below host contamination warnings of license files for
> > > > each recipe, when we try to create a separate ${PN}-lic package (which
> > > > contains license files), by setting LICENSE_CREATE_PACKAGE equal to "1"
> > > > in local.conf.
> > > >
> > > > -- snip --
> > > > WARNING: QA Issue: libcgroup:
> > /libcgroup-lic/usr/share/licenses/libcgroup/generic_LGPLv2.1 is owned by
> > uid 5001, which is the same as the user running bitbake. This may be due to
> > host contamination [host-user-contaminated]
> > > > WARNING: QA Issue: attr: /attr-lic/usr/share/licenses/attr/libattr.c
> > is owned by uid 5001, which is the same as the user running bitbake. This
> > may be due to host contamination [host-user-contaminated]
> > > > WARNING: QA Issue: bash: /bash-lic/usr/share/licenses/bash/COPYING is
> > owned by uid 5001, which is the same as the user running bitbake. This may
> > be due to host contamination [host-user-contaminated]
> > > > -- CUT --
> > > >
> > > > Since the license files from source and OE-core, are populated in a
> > normal
> > > > shell environment rather in pseudo environment (fakeroot); the
> > ownership of
> > > > these files will be same as host user running bitbake. During the
> > do_package
> > > > task (which runs in pseudo environment (fakeroot)), os.link preserves
> > the
> > > > ownership of these license files as host user instead of root user.
> > > > This causes license files to have UID same as host user id and
> > resulting in
> > > > above warnings during do_package_qa task.
> > > >
> > > > Changing ownership of license files to root user under fakeroot
> > environment
> > > > will solve above warnings, and on exiting fakeroot environment the
> > license
> > > > files will continue to be owned by host user.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jagadeesh Krishnanjanappa <jkrishnanjanappa at mvista.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >   meta/classes/license.bbclass | 1 +
> > > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/meta/classes/license.bbclass
> > b/meta/classes/license.bbclass
> > > > index c616a20..d400ac0 100644
> > > > --- a/meta/classes/license.bbclass
> > > > +++ b/meta/classes/license.bbclass
> > > > @@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ def copy_license_files(lic_files_paths, destdir):
> > > >                   os.remove(dst)
> > > >               if os.access(src, os.W_OK) and (os.stat(src).st_dev ==
> > os.stat(destdir).st_dev):
> > > >                   os.link(src, dst)
> > > > +                os.chown(dst,os.getuid(),os.getgid())

is os.getuid() and os.getgid() the correct value you want to use? I
would expect root:root.

> > > >               else:
> > > >                   shutil.copyfile(src, dst)
> > > >           except Exception as e:
> > > >
> > > --
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Openembedded-core mailing list
> > > Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> > > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
> >
> > --
> > Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
> >

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20151125/f42fbe1a/attachment-0002.sig>