[OE-core] [PATCH] systemd: disable 'libdir' QA check

[Khem Raj]

This library may be private however this does not mean it should be hidden
in a dedicated path. But I guess its better to lower qa guards then carry a
patch for life

On Dec 13, 2016 7:20 AM, "Mark Asselstine" <mark.asselstine at windriver.com>
wrote:

On Monday, December 12, 2016 9:17:14 PM EST Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 12 December 2016 at 20:51, Mark Asselstine <
mark.asselstine at windriver.com
> > wrote:
> >
> > I think the discussion I pointed to in the commit log closes the door on
> > any
> > such change. Specific the comment from Lennart --
> > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/3810#issuecomment-235290526
> >
> > They don't want the library to be found in the default search path, they
> > want
> > to maintain this as a "hidden, internal resource".
>
> Oh if it's an implementation detail of systemd and not a user-facing
> library then I can see their argument I guess.
>
> Don't agree with it though.  But, the point is that as long as the parts
of
> systemd that could realistically be multilibd are in $libdir then this
> isn't a problem.

It is definitely an internal infra item for systemd and not seen as a
'public'
library so I think we are best to run with it. I am with you that I don't
necessarily agree with it. Khem, does this satisfy your concerns?

Mark

>
> Ross
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20161213/cec30e6e/attachment-0002.html>