[OE-core] a few questions about "COMPATIBLE_MACHINE" variable
Robert P. J. Day
rpjday at crashcourse.ca
Mon Dec 19 15:17:01 UTC 2016
as a starting point, COMPATIBLE_MACHINE is processed on a per-recipe
basis, and if it has no value, then there is no machine restriction
being applied to that recipe, correct? that's based on this snippet
from base.bbclass:
need_machine = d.getVar('COMPATIBLE_MACHINE')
if need_machine:
import re
compat_machines = (d.getVar('MACHINEOVERRIDES') or "").split(":")
for m in compat_machines:
if re.match(need_machine, m):
break
else:
raise bb.parse.SkipPackage("incompatible with machine %s (not in COMPATIBLE_MACHINE)" % d.getVar('MACHINE'))
so far, so good?
next, the documentation describes the value of that variable as a
regular expression, so the values are processed as RE patterns, but
some of the actual uses are confusing. from
poky/meta/recipes-kernel/linux:
$ grep -r COMPATIBLE_MACHINE *
linux-dummy.bb:#COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "your_machine"
linux-yocto_4.1.bb:COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "qemuarm|qemuarm64|qemux86|qemuppc|qemumips|qemumips64|qemux86-64"
linux-yocto_4.4.bb:COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "qemuarm|qemuarm64|qemux86|qemuppc|qemumips|qemumips64|qemux86-64"
linux-yocto_4.8.bb:COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "qemuarm|qemuarm64|qemux86|qemuppc|qemumips|qemumips64|qemux86-64"
linux-yocto-dev.bb:COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(qemuarm|qemux86|qemuppc|qemumips|qemumips64|qemux86-64)"
linux-yocto-rt_4.1.bb:COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(qemux86|qemux86-64|qemuarm|qemuppc|qemumips)"
linux-yocto-rt_4.4.bb:COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(qemux86|qemux86-64|qemuarm|qemuppc|qemumips)"
linux-yocto-rt_4.8.bb:COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(qemux86|qemux86-64|qemuarm|qemuppc|qemumips)"
linux-yocto-tiny_4.1.bb:COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(qemux86$)"
linux-yocto-tiny_4.4.bb:COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(qemux86$)"
linux-yocto-tiny_4.8.bb:COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(qemux86$)"
$
first, what is best practice -- to use parentheses or not? i'm
assuming it makes no difference, but it does seem inconsistent and
could cause some confusion.
next, if the possibilities in a list are REs, what is the point of
explicitly listing, say, "qemuarm|qemuarm64"? would not the RE
"qemuarm" subsume the more explicit "qemuarm64"? same for the other
architectures. (one could suggest that that entire line could be
shortened to "... = (^qemu)".)
the above seems pretty clear since the following lines would appear
to say that *only* the qemux86 is compatible:
linux-yocto-tiny_4.1.bb:COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(qemux86$)"
linux-yocto-tiny_4.4.bb:COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(qemux86$)"
linux-yocto-tiny_4.8.bb:COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(qemux86$)"
which suggests the following passage from the YP kernel dev manual is
a bit misleading:
"You must change it to match a list of the machines that your new
recipe supports. For example, to support the qemux86 and qemux86-64
machines, use the following form:
COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "qemux86|qemux86-64"
and if all this is true, then if you're introducing a new machine, to
be magnificently pedantic, one should not use:
COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_machinename = "machinename"
but
COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_machinename = "^machinename$"
just to play it safe. am i reading all this correctly?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list