[OE-core] some pedantic questions about layer.conf "best practices"
Robert P. J. Day
rpjday at crashcourse.ca
Tue Nov 1 10:04:44 UTC 2016
updating a tutorial about writing a proper layer.conf file, so some
nitpicky questions about recommended style.
first, when appending to BBFILES, is it recommended to explicitly
use separate wildcard patterns of "*.bb" and "*.bbappend", or just get
lazy and use "*.bb*"? i realize that, in the end, it makes no
effective difference; i just happen to prefer the more explicit
pattern; just wondering if anyone has any preferences on this either
way. (i did say "nitpicky.")
next, what is best practice for naming a layer, since standards seem
to differ. if i create a layer named "meta-rday", i've seen standards
where the layer is "named" with one of:
BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "rday"
BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "meta-rday"
BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "rday-layer"
amusingly, some freescale layers bounce around:
BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "freescale-layer"
BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "fsl-arm"
BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "fsl-ppc"
even the meta-openembedded (sub)layers don't have a consistent style;
some examples, which show all three styles:
meta-filesystems/conf/layer.conf:BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "filesystems-layer"
meta-initramfs/conf/layer.conf:BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "meta-initramfs"
meta-webserver/conf/layer.conf:BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "webserver"
is there an encouraged style?
finally, is it necessary to have LAYERDEPENDS include "core"? isn't
that automatic? how could you possibly have a viable build system
without the oe-core layer (unless this gives you the freedom to
replace it with a custom one, which i don't see the value of).
i think that's it for now ... thoughts?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list