[OE-core] [PATCH v4 5/7] wic: selftest: do not repeat core-image-minimal

[Ed Bartosh]

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:39:26PM +0100, Maciej Borzęcki wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Ed Bartosh <ed.bartosh at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 08:46:31AM +0100, Maciej Borzecki wrote:
> >> Replace repeated core-image-minimal with Wic class field.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Maciej Borzecki <maciej.borzecki at rndity.com>
> >> ---
> >>  meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/wic.py | 111 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> >>  1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/wic.py b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/wic.py
> >> index 2db14445956bc5adcf1e755844bbdb69edcb468f..37ed2c6de5a7f22f982f921476fa392304995b2e 100644
> >> --- a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/wic.py
> >> +++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/wic.py
> >> @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ class Wic(oeSelfTest):
> >>      resultdir = "/var/tmp/wic/build/"
> >>      image_is_ready = False
> >>
> >> +    OE_IMAGE = "core-image-minimal"
> >> +
> >>      def setUpLocal(self):
> >>          """This code is executed before each test method."""
> >>          arch = get_bb_var('HOST_ARCH', 'core-image-minimal')
> >> @@ -75,7 +77,7 @@ class Wic(oeSelfTest):
> >>                  tools += ' syslinux syslinux-native'
> >>              bitbake(tools)
> >>
> >> -            bitbake('core-image-minimal')
> >> +            bitbake(self.OE_IMAGE)
> >>              Wic.image_is_ready = True
> > I'd agree with Ross here - it looks less readable.
> > How it would look if we decide to add test case for another image?
> >
> 
> The usual way would be to:
> 
> class WicSatoImage(Wic):
>     OE_IMAGE = "core-image-sato"
> 
> But I think you make a fair point. The patch introduces unnecessary
> complexity, and is not really needed right now. I'll drop this patch if next
> version will be necessary.
> 
> Can you take a look at the rest of the patchset as well?
>
I already did. The patchset looks good to me. Thank you for your work!
+1

--
Regards,
Ed