[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] meta-intel.inc: Enable linux-intel and 4.9 by default for meta-intel hardware

[Saul Wold]

On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 08:50 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 6:45 AM, Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com>
> wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 13:02 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Enable the linux-intel production kernel for meta-intel by
> > > > default
> > > > for 4.9,
> > > > this will enable using the Intel production kernel.
> > > > 
> > > > This is a well tested 4.9 tree that will start to include
> > > > additional
> > > > support for the Apollolake and Joule hardware.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  conf/machine/include/meta-intel.inc | 4 ++--
> > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/conf/machine/include/meta-intel.inc
> > > > b/conf/machine/include/meta-intel.inc
> > > > index 21587fb..eb759c4 100644
> > > > --- a/conf/machine/include/meta-intel.inc
> > > > +++ b/conf/machine/include/meta-intel.inc
> > > > @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@
> > > >  #
> > > > 
> > > >  # Soft set linux-yocto as preferred kernel like x86-base.inc
> > > > -PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel ??= "linux-yocto"
> > > > -PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-yocto ?= "4.8%"
> > > > +PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel ?= "linux-intel"
> > > 
> > > whats the difference between linux-yocto and linux-intel ?
> > > 
> > Sorry for sending this to the wrong list.
> > 
> > This is a valid question, the difference will be faster integration
> > and
> > better testing /validation of upstream (or possibly pending
> > upstream )
> > patches for Intel Hardware.
> > 
> > Since the kernel will be coming from an Intel Source, it will be
> > fully
> > tested on more hardware that the current linux-yocto kernel gets
> > tested
> > against.
> > 
> > The update rate maybe about the same, with security updates as
> > needed
> > for more severe issues
> > 
> > As other vendors maintain kernels for their meta-vendor specific
> > layer,
> > Intel has chosen to maintain an Intel kernel based on the current
> > LTS
> > version (4.9) plus upstreamed patches. All content will be
> > backports
> > from internally maintained tracking trees being regularly updated.
> > 
> > meta-intel will likely continue to contain the linux-yocto-<latest> 
> > for
> > a non-LTS kernel.
> > 
> > Hope that clarifies this.
> 
> yes it does. So this is not a clone of linux-yocto but based directly
> on linux-stable.
> 
Correct, this is based directly on linux-stable and will have patches
that are backports from maintained tracking trees. As the new LTS is
defined each year, linux-intel and meta-intel will update to that newer
version. The older version will continue to be available and be updated
with stable updates as they are available.

Sau!

> > 
> > 
> > Sau!
> > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > +PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-intel ?= "4.9%"
> > > > 
> > > >  # for Xserver older than 1.13.0
> > > >  OLD_XSERVER_X86_EXT = "xserver-xorg-extension-dri \
> > > > --
> > > > 2.7.4
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Openembedded-core mailing list
> > > > Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> > > > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-cor
> > > > e