[OE-core] [PATCH v2 1/3] image.bbclass: No need to force image licence on MIT

[Geoffrey Levillain]

If there is a user-defined licence there is no need to enforce MIT
licence instead. Therefor we set MIT if there is no licence defined.

Note : It also permit to set the licence before inherit image
in overlayable images (where a licence is needed because of the files
associated to the image).

Signed-off-by: Geoffrey Levillain <geoffrey.levillain at smile.fr>
---
 meta/classes/image.bbclass | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/meta/classes/image.bbclass b/meta/classes/image.bbclass
index b5a4fb4a33..75c2860a75 100644
--- a/meta/classes/image.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/image.bbclass
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ TOOLCHAIN_TARGET_TASK += "${PACKAGE_INSTALL}"
 TOOLCHAIN_TARGET_TASK_ATTEMPTONLY += "${PACKAGE_INSTALL_ATTEMPTONLY}"
 POPULATE_SDK_POST_TARGET_COMMAND += "rootfs_sysroot_relativelinks; "
 
-LICENSE = "MIT"
+LICENSE ?= "MIT"
 PACKAGES = ""
 DEPENDS += "${MLPREFIX}qemuwrapper-cross depmodwrapper-cross"
 RDEPENDS += "${PACKAGE_INSTALL} ${LINGUAS_INSTALL}"
-- 
2.11.0