[OE-core] dbus seems to be given debian naming convention, breaking another recipe

[Christopher Larson]

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 7:40 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday at crashcourse.ca>
wrote:

>   moving on, i whipped together a recipe for libnet-dbus-perl, tried
> to build, and:
>
>   ...
>   DBus >= 1.3.0 is required
>   ...
>
> which is weird since oe-core contains the recipe:
>
>   meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus_1.10.14.bb
>
> but when i examined the deployed rpms:
>
> -rw-r--r--. 3 rpjday rpjday  163963 Feb 20 06:04
> dbus-1-1.10.14-r0.ppc7400.rpm
> -rw-r--r--. 3 rpjday rpjday 1393445 Feb 20 06:04
> dbus-dbg-1.10.14-r0.ppc7400.rpm
> -rw-r--r--. 3 rpjday rpjday   36372 Feb 20 06:04
> dbus-dev-1.10.14-r0.ppc7400.rpm
> -rw-r--r--. 3 rpjday rpjday   92124 Feb 20 06:04
> dbus-doc-1.10.14-r0.ppc7400.rpm
> -rw-r--r--. 3 rpjday rpjday    2960 Feb 20 06:04
> dbus-ptest-1.10.14-r0.ppc7400.rpm
> -rw-r--r--. 3 rpjday rpjday  135131 Feb 20 06:04 libdbus-1-3-1.10.14-r0.
> ppc7400.rpm
>
>   uh, what's with the "dbus-1-1.10.14-r0.ppc7400.rpm"?
>                            ^^^^
> oh, wait, here's a line from the dbus recipe:
>
>   DEBIANNAME_${PN} = "dbus-1"
>
> it would seem that that is getting in the way, or am i doing something
> silly?
>

debian.bbclass handles this, but package naming is irrelevent. Your
buildsystem isn’t running out and trying to find a binary rpm, at least I’d
certainly hope not.
-- 
Christopher Larson
kergoth at gmail dot com
Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus
Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20170220/8c538c48/attachment-0002.html>