[OE-core] [PATCH v8 1/3] kernel: Move Device Tree support to kernel.bbclass

[Richard Purdie]

On Tue, 2017-09-12 at 17:36 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> The Device Tree is commonly used but it is still kept as a .inc file
> instead of a proper class. Instead now we move the Device Tree code
> to
> a kernel-devicetree class and automatically enable it when the
> KERNEL_DEVICETREE variable is set.
> 
> To avoid breakage in existing layers, we kept a linux-dtb.inc file
> which raises a warning telling the user about the change so in next
> release this can be removed.

Still causing breakage:

https://autobuilder.yocto.io/builders/nightly-mips/builds/469/steps/BuildImages/logs/stdio
https://autobuilder.yocto.io/builders/nightly-arm64/builds/454/steps/BuildImages/logs/stdio
https://autobuilder.yocto.io/builders/nightly-mips-lsb/builds/464/steps/BuildImages/logs/stdio
https://autobuilder.yocto.io/builders/nightly-mips64/builds/467/steps/BuildImages/logs/stdio
https://autobuilder.yocto.io/builders/nightly-multilib/builds/489/steps/BuildImages_5/logs/stdio
https://autobuilder.yocto.io/builders/nightly-ppc/builds/488/steps/BuildImages/logs/stdio
https://autobuilder.yocto.io/builders/nightly-ppc-lsb/builds/477/steps/BuildImages/logs/stdio


All look like racing of do_compile_devicetree and do_make_scripts?

https://autobuilder.yocto.io/builders/nightly-arm/builds/537/steps/Buil
ding%20Toolchain%20Images/logs/stdio

"package kernel-devicetree-4.12.10+git0+42965d664f_fd16268214-r0.1.qemuarm does not have a compatible architecture"

Cheers,

Richard