[OE-core] [PATCH V2] perf: make a copy of kernel source to perf workdir
Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfield at gmail.com
Tue Apr 24 00:45:14 UTC 2018
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 6:05 PM, Richard Purdie <
richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-04-23 at 13:51 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > On 2018-04-23 4:13 AM, Hongxu Jia wrote:
> > >
> > > Since perf modify kernel source which shared by multiple
> > > recipes, it probably caused kernel-devsrc compile failure
> > > at world build.
> > > ...
> > > >
> > > > 0 blocks
> > > > cpio: ./tools/perf/arch/arm/util/sedr7ORqk: Cannot stat:
> > > No such file or directory
> > > >
> > > > 0 blocks
> > > ...
> > > cpio tried to find a file at ${S}/tools/perf and failed
> > > if the input list is not valid.
> > >
> > > Make a copy of kernel shared source directory into a perf workdir
> > > could fix the issue.
> > >
> > > Drop `Fix for rebuilding' which is obsolete
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Hongxu Jia <hongxu.jia at windriver.com>
> > > ---
> > > meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb | 11 ++++++-----
> > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb b/meta/recipes-
> > > kernel/perf/perf.bb
> > > index 872b5f0..8b40806 100644
> > > --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb
> > > +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb
> > > @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ export PERL_ARCHLIB = "${STAGING_LIBDIR}${PERL_OW
> > > N_DIR}/perl/${@get_perl_version
> > >
> > > inherit kernelsrc
> > >
> > > -B = "${WORKDIR}/${BPN}-${PV}"
> > > +S = "${WORKDIR}/${BP}"
> > > SPDX_S = "${S}/tools/perf"
> > >
> > > # The LDFLAGS is required or some old kernels fails due missing
> > > @@ -119,11 +119,12 @@ do_install() {
> > > fi
> > > }
> > >
> > > -do_configure_prepend () {
> > > - # Fix for rebuilding
> > > - rm -rf ${B}/
> > > - mkdir -p ${B}/
> > > +do_configure[prefuncs] += "git_clone_kernel_source"
> > > +git_clone_kernel_source () {
> > > + git clone --single-branch ${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR} ${S}
> > I probably would have used "cp -a -r", or similar. Since it
> > is possible that a kernel may not actually be a git repo (linux-yocto
> > always is, but that is just one data point).
> >
> > Also, did you try just copying the tools SRC dir + whatever
> > infrastructure is needed to build ? That will save us a LOT
> > of i/o when moving the source around for perf to build.
> >
> > But outside of those details/mechanics, the approach is sound.
>
> Our "copy hardlink tree" function, whatever its called is sometimes of
> use in these cases...
>
> I think I'm the current owner of a bug in this area which I've sadly
> not gotten to yet :(.
>
> Also, have we considered the alternative - not copying tools/perf for
> the kernel devsrc?
>
We could, but sometimes the devsrc is actually used to build the tools.
I know that I have used it to build perf in the past.
It is mostly skipped in my rewritten version (which I'll resubmit after 2.5
releases). So for now, I'm thinking the smallest footprint change makes
the most sense (as to which that is, that is probably not black and white).
Bruce
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
--
"Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee
at its end"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20180423/8d1227ef/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list