[OE-core] [PATCH] kernel: Use KERNEL_IMAGETYPE_FOR_MAKE in do_bundle_initramfs

[Richard Purdie]

On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 13:31 -0800, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 1:21 AM, Thomas Perrot <thomas.perrot at tupi.fr
> > wrote:
> > 
> > In the case of a fitImage the this step should be done on the
> > image use to assemble the fitImage.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Perrot <thomas.perrot at tupi.fr>
> > ---
> >  meta/classes/kernel.bbclass | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass
> > b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass
> > index c42f85c665..ff09d4c4c7 100644
> > --- a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass
> > +++ b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass
> > @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ do_bundle_initramfs () {
> >                 copy_initramfs
> >                 # Backing up kernel image relies on its
> > type(regular file or symbolic link)
> >                 tmp_path=""
> > -               for type in ${KERNEL_IMAGETYPES} ; do
> > +               for type in ${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE_FOR_MAKE} ; do
> The net result of this change is to no longer backup the non-
> initramfs
> vmlinux.gz kernel image before creating the kernel image(s)
> containing
> bundled initramfs (plus some other corner cases, depending on whether
> the legacy KERNEL_IMAGETYPE and KERNEL_ALT_IMAGETYPE variables are
> used and whether or not KERNEL_IMAGETYPES contains both vmlinux and
> vmlinux.gz or vmlinux.gz only).
> 
> Can you explain a little how that's related to building fitImage
> kernels?
> 
> This code in do_bundle_initramfs() is extremely fragile and changes
> may only break less well testing targets such as MIPS, so any changes
> need to be very carefully reviewed and tested.

Actually, I think it means we need better tests.

I'm seriously considering removing a lot of the stuff in kernel.bbclass
and then rebuilding things in hopefully a cleaner way. The test for
anything being needed would be whether our regression tests pass.

I appreciate the idea will fill some with horror but there are a few
places the code code is turning into an unmaintainable (and
unreviewable) mess, the kernel classes are getting there :(

Cheers,

Richard