[OE-core] [PATCH] package_rpm: correctly handle LICENSE_${PN}

[Ross Burton]

RPM spec files don't distinguish between spec-level license and the primary
package license, so always output the License for every package (defaulting to
the recipe-wide license) and use LICENSE_${PN} if set for the primary package.

As the primary use of package_rpm is to generate built packages, this fixes the
license fields in the generated packages.

[ YOCTO #12057 ]

Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton at intel.com>
---
 meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass b/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass
index b08608c8466..3cbbd1eb537 100644
--- a/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass
@@ -382,6 +382,7 @@ python write_specfile () {
 
         # Gather special src/first package data
         if srcname == splitname:
+            srclicense     = splitlicense
             srcrdepends    = splitrdepends
             srcrrecommends = splitrrecommends
             srcrsuggests   = splitrsuggests
@@ -421,8 +422,7 @@ python write_specfile () {
             spec_preamble_bottom.append('Release: %s' % splitrelease)
         if srcepoch != splitepoch:
             spec_preamble_bottom.append('Epoch: %s' % splitepoch)
-        if srclicense != splitlicense:
-            spec_preamble_bottom.append('License: %s' % splitlicense)
+        spec_preamble_bottom.append('License: %s' % splitlicense)
         spec_preamble_bottom.append('Group: %s' % splitsection)
 
         if srccustomtagschunk != splitcustomtagschunk:
-- 
2.11.0