[OE-core] [PATCH] sdkext: use simpler kernel module for devtool test
Mark Asselstine
mark.asselstine at windriver.com
Wed Aug 21 21:56:24 UTC 2019
On Wednesday, August 21, 2019 4:57:40 P.M. EDT Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-08-20 at 13:52 -0400, Mark Asselstine wrote:
> > The current devtool test for the building of an out-of-tree kernel
> > module uses something which requires several "high order" kconfigs to
> > be set. This results in the test failing, not for expected reasons,
> > but rather because it depends on specific kernel configuration.
> >
> > You will get error messages such as
> >
> > ERROR: "video_ioctl2"
> > [.../1.0-r5/testsdkext/workspace/sources/v4l2loopback-
> >
> > driver/v4l2loopback.ko]
> >
> > undefined!
> > ERROR: "video_unregister_device"
> > [.../1.0-r5/testsdkext/workspace/sources/v4l2loopback-
> >
> > driver/v4l2loopback.ko]
> >
> > undefined!
> >
> > Using a simpler hello-world kernel module example will only require
> > that CONFIG_MODULE is enabled, thus avoiding a false positive.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Asselstine <mark.asselstine at windriver.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Richard, it is unclear if I need to match this change in
> > meta/lib/oeqa/manual/crops.json.
>
> Those are manual tests for crops. They probably do also need this
> change as it would make them more reliable if/as anyone every automates
> them, or runs them manually.
I will affect the change there then too in the V2.
>
> > Please let me know and I
> >
> > send a V2 which does this. I am not fond of pointing at
> > my own github but it was the best option to ensure it will
> > exist and not be messed with.
>
> The best option may be to put that repo onto git.yoctoproject.org?
Not sure I get a vote but as far as the content goes I have no issue with it
being elsewhere, like git.yoctoproject.org.
Mark
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list