[OE-core] Consultation about the issue of archiver
zang
zangrc.fnst at cn.fujitsu.com
Tue Aug 27 07:20:44 UTC 2019
hello:
Recently, when I enabled the archiver.bbclass, I found that some
packages could not generate the srpm package. The reason is that it
returned in the function copyleft_should_include() in the file
archiver.bbclass.
| included, reason = copyleft_should_include(d)
| if not included:
| bb.debug(1, 'archiver: %s is excluded: %s' % (pn, reason))
| /*return from here*/
| return
| else:
| bb.debug(1, 'archiver: %s is included: %s' % (pn, reason))
Why do you want to make a license judgment on the package?
I hope someone can answer it, thank you very much.
The following is my local.conf:
| ...
| INHERIT += "archiver"
| ARCHIVER_MODE[srpm] = "1"
| ARCHIVER_MODE[src] = "original"
| ...
e.g. When I use the following
command,tmp/work/core2-64-poky-linux/openssl/1.1.1c-r0/deploy-sources/
is empty.
| bitbake -f -c deploy_archives openssl
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20190827/e52e6cb9/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list