[OE-core] [PATCH] libical: upgrade to 3.0.5

[Khem Raj]

On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 2:15 PM Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 2:12 PM Burton, Ross <ross.burton at intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > The last release of Orage was four years ago: I suggest removing that
> > from meta-xfce instead of keeping everyone else using an old version
> > of libical.
>
> thats the latest unfortunately. I think a simple fix would be to drop
> is_utc field  setting
> in orage since it seems to gone in libical3, I will try to cookup a
> patch and try
>

sent here
https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/163311/

we can merge libical3 update

> >
> > Ross
> >
> > On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 22:04, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > this is causing a failure in meta-xfce
> > >
> > > https://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/253910/
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 6:12 PM Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 6:05 PM Mittal, Anuj <anuj.mittal at intel.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 2019-07-22 at 17:59 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 4:17 PM Mittal, Anuj <anuj.mittal at intel.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > On Mon, 2019-07-22 at 15:48 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> > > > > > > > -LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1 | MPL-1.0"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > this should be MPL-2.0 | LGPL-2.1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
> > > > > > > > "file://COPYING;md5=d4fc58309d8ed46587ac63bb449d82f8 \
> > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > file://LICENSE;md5=d1a0891cd3e582b3e2ec8fe63badbbb6"
> > > > > > > > +LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1 | MPL-2"
> > > > > > > > +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
> > > > > > > > "file://LICENSE;md5=1910a2a76ddf6a9ba369182494170d87 \
> > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > file://LICENSE.LGPL21.txt;md5=933adb561f159e7c3da079536f0ed871 \
> > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > file://LICENSE.MPL2.txt;md5=9741c346eef56131163e13b9db1241b3"
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Should this be MPL-2.0 instead? This is causing warnings:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > the license is MPL-2.0 but the license file name is MPL2.txt so this
> > > > > > seems fine.
> > > > >
> > > > > I meant the field in LICENSE. Quoted the wrong text.
> > > >
> > > > reply quote confused me. yes it is wrong. It should be MPL-2.0
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.