[OE-core] M3 build status

[akuster808]

On 3/2/20 8:47 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-02-29 at 07:38 -0800, akuster808 wrote:
>> On 2/29/20 5:13 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>> Just to quickly update everyone, a number of patches we probably
>>> wanted
>>> in 3.1 have had issues but have had the issues resolved and the
>>> patches
>>> have now merged. Thanks to all who dived in and helped with those!
>> So no Bind update?
> There is still time, please send an updated patch!
Its unclear to me what change is outstanding.

- armin
>
>>> The patches/issues I'm aware of that are left:
>>>
>>> * ltp upgrade (musl issue)
>>> * util-linux upgrade (breaks wic test, probably simple fix)
>> I can look at the two above but can't start until Sunday so if
>> someone else grabs them today, have at it.
> These are now done thankfully.
>
>>> * coreutils ptest addition (blocked on libmodule-build-per 
>>>   reproducibility issue)
> Still not done.
>
>>> * psplash systemd race (smurray may have a fix)
> Still not done.
>
>>> * autobuilder new branch handling for initial run test comparisons
>>>   (open high bug with RP)
>>> * tinfoil race (open high bug, struggling for owner)
> Both done.
>
>>> * LockedSigs intermittent test failure (RP has open high bug, no
>>> clue 
>>>   how to reproduce or why, total mystery)
> Spent hours on this, limited success :(
>
>>> * Intermittent selftest failure with SystemExit (High open bug,
>>> Kai owns)
> Still pending.
>
>>> As ever, help with any of these welcome. We'll build M3 when a
>>> majority of the above are ready.
> Also, I've realised:
> * there is a high priority pseudo issue assigned to me
> * gcc buildtools tarball issue
>
> + the bind issue you mention
>
>> So where are patches going doing this time that will be in after the
>> release?
> I try not to encourage people to send upgrade patches during
> stabilisation as its a distraction for everyone and means fewer people
> caring about the release. I have had to queue them in the past since
> people ignore this and I may have to again depending on what people do
> :(.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
>
>
>