[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] reproducibile_build: Fix SDE file generation when unpack reruns
Richard Purdie
richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org
Sat Mar 7 22:37:48 UTC 2020
Currently, if an existing TMPDIR is rebuilt, do_fetch/do_unpack can rerun
but SDE would remain unchanged. This leads to different results compared
to a fresh build. An example change which triggered this is:
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=cb4e69e6346a9fbeebf83a5d5397cacbd41d48b5
Instead, delete any existing SDE and recalculate if we're reunning.
Also rename and drop the do_ prefix since these are for tasks,
not functions.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org>
---
meta/classes/reproducible_build.bbclass | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes/reproducible_build.bbclass b/meta/classes/reproducible_build.bbclass
index 750eb950f28..8da40f656ac 100644
--- a/meta/classes/reproducible_build.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/reproducible_build.bbclass
@@ -150,11 +150,12 @@ def fixed_source_date_epoch():
bb.debug(1, "No tarball or git repo found to determine SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH")
return 0
-python do_create_source_date_epoch_stamp() {
+python create_source_date_epoch_stamp() {
epochfile = d.getVar('SDE_FILE')
+ # If it exists we need to regenerate as the sources may have changed
if os.path.isfile(epochfile):
- bb.debug(1, "Reusing SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH from: %s" % epochfile)
- return
+ bb.debug(1, "Deleting existing SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH from: %s" % epochfile)
+ os.remove(epochfile)
sourcedir = d.getVar('S')
source_date_epoch = (
@@ -197,5 +198,5 @@ BB_HASHBASE_WHITELIST += "SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH"
python () {
if d.getVar('BUILD_REPRODUCIBLE_BINARIES') == '1':
- d.appendVarFlag("do_unpack", "postfuncs", " do_create_source_date_epoch_stamp")
+ d.appendVarFlag("do_unpack", "postfuncs", " create_source_date_epoch_stamp")
}
--
2.25.0
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list