[oe] Missing GLIBC_<version> tags on binaries

[Phil Blundell]

On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 19:03 +0000, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> I am fighting with an issue for last cuple of days and after checking
> a lot of weird stuff it seems that the root cause of problem is a
> linking issue.
> 
> I am having trouble with apps using semaphores. Those are lacking the
> GLIBC_2.1 or similar tags and then doesn't work. I rebuilt the
> application to check and it keep doing the linking wrong.
> 
> Any clue?
> 
> Distro: minimal
> Machine: i586-generic

Can you be more specific about what's going wrong?  I guess you are
saying that your libc lacks the GLIBC_2.1 version of some symbol, but
which one?  Does the problem show up during linking or at run time?
Which binaries in particular?

p.