2011.03-maintenance created

[Koen Kooi]

Op 8 mrt 2011, om 15:02 heeft Tom Rini het volgende geschreven:

> On 03/08/2011 12:46 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> Hello.
>> 
>> On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 08:27, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>> Op 8 mrt 2011, om 04:55 heeft Tom Rini het volgende geschreven:
>>> 
>>>> On 03/07/2011 05:27 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Op 6 mrt 2011, om 14:43 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 16:22 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>>>>>> After talking to Stefan and Tom I created
>>>>>>> http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/log/?h=2011.03-maintenance, but we haven't decided on how to manage it yet. Since this branch will likely be heavily used due to the oe-core transition I wanted to get you opinion on how to manage this branch. The suggestions so far:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> * backports only
>>>>>>> * pull model
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I don't really have a strong preference either way. The previous
>>>>>>> "stable" branches have been victims of FUD, so it would be nice to
>>>>>>> have a blessing from the TSC this time :)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> My suggestion is to have a clear owner of it. That person decides what
>>>>>> goes in and what the policy is for patch acceptance.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I can be the owner of that if Tom and/or Stefan don't want to do that, but I am worried about what Graeme said: http://www.xora.org.uk/2011/03/03/oe-board-resignation/
>>>> 
>>>> I've thought about it a bit and yeah, I'd be happy to run the maintenance branch, on a pull model.
>>> 
>>> Awesome!
>> 
>> Great. Just to avoid confusion on my part. With pull model you mean picking up
>> patches yourself from patchwork in this case? Or should people send real pull
>> request, with a branch to pull from, additional to the patches?
> 
> Either real pull requests or from patchwork but only me doing the pushing to the branch.

I'll start collecting backports I need in a branch :)