Hosting BSP layers on oe.org?
Philip Balister
philip at balister.org
Mon Mar 21 14:46:55 UTC 2011
On 03/21/2011 09:57 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 4 mrt 2011, om 21:30 heeft Tom Rini het volgende geschreven:
>
>> On 03/04/2011 10:10 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>> CC: ing the board, although I know Philip is playing in the snow next week.
>>>
>>> Op 4 mrt 2011, om 17:36 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven:
>>>
>>>> On 3/4/11 10:30 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure if this a pure TSC issue, but really like your input on this.
>>>>> <TI hat on> I would like to host the TI BSP layer(s) on oe.org as well as the
>>>>> mailinglist(s) and patchwork config(s) to encourage the wider community to
>>>>> participate. My question is "Do we want that" and if so, "Do we want to
>>>>> encourage it?".<TI hat off>
>>>>>
>>>>> It would be really nice if we can get people (e.g. silicon vendors, OEM,
>>>>> community developers) to do their OE stuff in the open and host them on
>>>>> oe.org. What's your opinion on this?
>>>>
>>>> Speaking for my involvement in Yocto for a small bit. This was one of the
>>>> things that we had planned early to enable in Yocto. We were not sure that
>>>> purely open source groups such as OE would allow for BSP layers to be hosted
>>>> from their site or not. (Especially when you factor in many BSPs require
>>>> proprietary drivers of some type to be fully functional...)
>>>>
>>>> <back to my TSC role> I would certainly encourage BSP layers under the umbrella
>>>> of Open Embedded. But I have a feeling this is one of the questions we need to
>>>> ask the board about. They're the ones that are going to give us guidance on
>>>> what rules (proprietary or not) as well as if they think it's appropriate. -- if
>>>> they do, we can certainly help guide this within OE.
>>>>
>>>>> regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Koen
>>
>> With my TSC hat on, I also see this as a board issue, not a TSC issue.
>
> I reread http://wiki.openembedded.org/index.php/TSCCharter and it is definitely a TSC issue. So can we move forth with the discussion? The board is still unable to make any progress on this it seems.
I'd remind you, we said we would make a decision after face to face
meetings at ELC.
The boards current thinking is we are fine hosting community layers on
OE.org. What a community layer is still needs defining.
Personally, I can see case where boards have community and layers and
"official" layers. I do not think this is necessarily a bad thing.
Philip
More information about the tsc
mailing list