Openembedded.org talk:Help: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(proposal moved to the Openembedded namespace) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
: It's not a ''need'' but a ''should''. And i believe it is very helpful. If we see this help not as a dogma (as stated above) i propose to keep this point. -- [[User:Sledz|Sledz]] 11:46, 14 February 2009 (UTC) | : It's not a ''need'' but a ''should''. And i believe it is very helpful. If we see this help not as a dogma (as stated above) i propose to keep this point. -- [[User:Sledz|Sledz]] 11:46, 14 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:: should in open-source is a requirement. I'd rather have people add a page than giving up because they don't know about categories. --[[User:Laibsch|Laibsch]] 08:53, 25 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
== best-practice not dogma == | == best-practice not dogma == | ||
Revision as of 08:53, 25 February 2009
needs to be in a category
I don't think every page needs to be in a category. --Laibsch 07:59, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- It's not a need but a should. And i believe it is very helpful. If we see this help not as a dogma (as stated above) i propose to keep this point. -- Sledz 11:46, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- should in open-source is a requirement. I'd rather have people add a page than giving up because they don't know about categories. --Laibsch 08:53, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
best-practice not dogma
The text should clearly state from the beginning that this is best-practice not dogma. I'd appreciate any contribution, no matter the form, over people being scared to contribute. This wiki is still legible, I think, we don't need to be too rigid. I guess we can just let users contribute. If they want to follow our guidelines, more power to them. If not, we can correct their "mistakes" as wiki maintainers. --Laibsch 07:59, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, i agree with this best practise instead of dogma. I'll change the proposal. -- Sledz 08:56, 13 February 2009 (UTC)