TSCDecisions: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* The TSC feels bitbake 1.8 should be an option for the upcoming OE December stable release as switching to 1.10 before the release is too soon. After the release OE.master should switch to 1.10. For reference, standalone python binaries from Yocto can be used (https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2010-November/000176.html) on systems which don't have a recent python version. | * The TSC feels bitbake 1.8 should be an option for the upcoming OE December stable release as switching to 1.10 before the release is too soon. After the release OE.master should switch to 1.10. For reference, standalone python binaries from Yocto can be used (https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2010-November/000176.html) on systems which don't have a recent python version. | ||
* The TSC considered the issue of staggered election of its members. It felt that with members serving a one year term, staggering this could lead to a lot of "paperwork" without any real net benefit. If the OE members wish the TSC to do this, they are happy to do so though, they would just like to see member representation of this. | |||
Revision as of 16:53, 3 November 2010
TSC Decisions
2010/11/03
- The TSC supports the idea of regular patchwork days and proposes these should be on a regular timeslot around a Friday/Weekend/Monday on a monthly basis. Stefan Schmidt has kindly volunteered to coordinate these and has the support of the TSC. Mickey takes the action to communicate this to members via email.
- The TSC feels bitbake 1.8 should be an option for the upcoming OE December stable release as switching to 1.10 before the release is too soon. After the release OE.master should switch to 1.10. For reference, standalone python binaries from Yocto can be used (https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2010-November/000176.html) on systems which don't have a recent python version.
- The TSC considered the issue of staggered election of its members. It felt that with members serving a one year term, staggering this could lead to a lot of "paperwork" without any real net benefit. If the OE members wish the TSC to do this, they are happy to do so though, they would just like to see member representation of this.