Deprecation Policy: Difference between revisions

From Openembedded.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Improve wiki markup (proper wiki lists))
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
= Why: =
= Why: =


- Reduce the security gap
* Reduce the security gap
- Increase quality of layer and recipes
* Increase quality of layer and recipes
- Reduce technical debt
* Reduce technical debt
- Improved developer productivity
* Improved developer productivity


= Challenges: =
= Challenges: =


Obsolete code adds to maintenance burden.
* Obsolete code adds to maintenance burden.
Old code consumes developers’ time which could be better focused elsewhere
* Old code consumes developers’ time which could be better focused elsewhere
Can’t tell who is using things
* Can’t tell who is using things
Sometimes recipes are one-off contributions which are unmaintained
* Sometimes recipes are one-off contributions which are unmaintained
there might be a perception that obsolete/removed recipes from OE-Core can be added to meta-oe
* There might be a perception that obsolete/removed recipes from OE-Core can be added to meta-oe
 
* Users aren’t often paying attention to development branches, only release branches
Users aren’t often paying attention to development branches, only release branches
* Full meta-openembedded builds consume significant resources. Long builds slow down development and narrows down testing matrix
 
* Obsolete recipes adds inertia towards new developments
Full meta-openembedded builds consume significant resources. Long builds slow down development and narrows down testing matrix
* Older/obsolete recipes tend to become of poorer quality more so over time as they are either not brought to use latest stuff or are simply missing it.
 
Obsolete recipes adds inertia towards new developments
 
Older/obsolete recipes tend to become of poorer quality more so over time as they are either not brought to use latest stuff or are simply missing it.


Keeping this in sight, here is a proposal to define some guidelines for community to assess recipe deprecation
Keeping this in sight, here is a proposal to define some guidelines for community to assess recipe deprecation
Line 31: Line 27:
= Deprecation guideline criteria: =
= Deprecation guideline criteria: =


- Recipe is not buildable
* Recipe is not buildable
 
* Recipe has known security issues (particularly high impact ones)
- Recipe has known security issues (particularly high impact ones)
* package's upstream is not actively responding to build or security issues (e.g. a large patch backlog)
 
* Functionality from recipe has been obsoleted by other recipes and no longer commonly used
- package's upstream is not actively responding to build or security issues (e.g. a large patch backlog)
* Recipe has no activity upstream (no activity for e.g. 5+ years is a concern)
 
* Recipe with many architecture exclusions and isn’t portable but not hardware specific recipe
- Functionality from recipe has been obsoleted by other recipes and no longer commonly used
* It is not a key dependency for large set of recipes/layers (check layer index using depends:[recipename])
 
* Niche specific recipe may better moved to a more focused topic layer
- Recipe has no activity upstream (no activity for e.g. 5+ years is a concern)
* Poor quality recipe or recipe build environment with no maintainer willing to improve
 
* Recipe has problematic host dependencies (e.g. 32-bit runtime) and no maintainer improving situation
- Recipe with many architecture exclusions and isn’t portable but not hardware specific recipe
 
- It is not a key dependency for large set of recipes/layers (check layer index using depends:[recipename])
 
- Niche specific recipe may better moved to a more focused topic layer
 
- Poor quality recipe or recipe build environment with no maintainer willing to improve
 
- Recipe has problematic host dependencies (e.g. 32-bit runtime) and no maintainer improving situation


= Process: =
= Process: =


- Maintainer can remove if the decision is clear to them and has discretion over the process
* Maintainer can remove if the decision is clear to them and has discretion over the process
 
* For unclear situations, exclude from parsing initially with reason documented
- For unclear situations, exclude from parsing initially with reason documented
* Notification is in the form of a patch adding the exclusion
 
* After a reasonable time if not fixed, recipe is removed
- Notification is in the form of a patch adding the exclusion
* Recipe removals scheduled after each release point
- After a reasonable time if not fixed, recipe is removed
* If someone addresses the underlying issues the recipe can be added back or have parsing re-enabled.
- Recipe removals scheduled after each release point
* If there is a conflict, issue can be raised to OE TSC for a decision
- If someone addresses the underlying issues the recipe can be added back or have parsing re-enabled.
- If there is a conflict, issue can be raised to OE TSC for a decision


[[Category:Policy]]
[[Category:Policy]]

Latest revision as of 16:45, 16 July 2024

Recipes and metadata deprecation policy

Here is deprecation policy and guidelines for recipes and related metadata maintained in layers under meta-openembedded repository

Why:

  • Reduce the security gap
  • Increase quality of layer and recipes
  • Reduce technical debt
  • Improved developer productivity

Challenges:

  • Obsolete code adds to maintenance burden.
  • Old code consumes developers’ time which could be better focused elsewhere
  • Can’t tell who is using things
  • Sometimes recipes are one-off contributions which are unmaintained
  • There might be a perception that obsolete/removed recipes from OE-Core can be added to meta-oe
  • Users aren’t often paying attention to development branches, only release branches
  • Full meta-openembedded builds consume significant resources. Long builds slow down development and narrows down testing matrix
  • Obsolete recipes adds inertia towards new developments
  • Older/obsolete recipes tend to become of poorer quality more so over time as they are either not brought to use latest stuff or are simply missing it.

Keeping this in sight, here is a proposal to define some guidelines for community to assess recipe deprecation

Deprecation guideline criteria:

  • Recipe is not buildable
  • Recipe has known security issues (particularly high impact ones)
  • package's upstream is not actively responding to build or security issues (e.g. a large patch backlog)
  • Functionality from recipe has been obsoleted by other recipes and no longer commonly used
  • Recipe has no activity upstream (no activity for e.g. 5+ years is a concern)
  • Recipe with many architecture exclusions and isn’t portable but not hardware specific recipe
  • It is not a key dependency for large set of recipes/layers (check layer index using depends:[recipename])
  • Niche specific recipe may better moved to a more focused topic layer
  • Poor quality recipe or recipe build environment with no maintainer willing to improve
  • Recipe has problematic host dependencies (e.g. 32-bit runtime) and no maintainer improving situation

Process:

  • Maintainer can remove if the decision is clear to them and has discretion over the process
  • For unclear situations, exclude from parsing initially with reason documented
  • Notification is in the form of a patch adding the exclusion
  • After a reasonable time if not fixed, recipe is removed
  • Recipe removals scheduled after each release point
  • If someone addresses the underlying issues the recipe can be added back or have parsing re-enabled.
  • If there is a conflict, issue can be raised to OE TSC for a decision