Talk:OEandYourDistro: Difference between revisions
(Undo revision 2746 by 91.201.66.3 (Talk)) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
It is necessary to install chrpath for bitbake version 1.8.18 ! | It is necessary to install chrpath for bitbake version 1.8.18 ! | ||
== Oct 2010 Tested on out of the box x86 "debian lenny" & "ubuntu karmic" | |||
both lenny and karmic say package "apr" not found | |||
lenny has python problems that keep bitbake from doing anything except complaining - giving up on lenny for now | |||
karmic has gotten past the part that lenny choked on and is compiling - no problems yet | |||
Revision as of 09:27, 10 October 2010
maybe as a last paragraph in the install page it is wise to include some checks how to test that the install is functioning. for me as a newbie, I followed the steps, but I have no idea what I have done to my system now...
Complementary packages (for debian)
What exactly are "complementary packages" ? It is not really clear what they are needed for --Zimbatm 12:29, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- as evidenced by the structure of the page, complementary is the opposite of mandatory packages. I'll rename the section to supplementary packages which may make the distinction more clear. --Laibsch 04:51, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
further mandatory packages
it may be that further packages are necessary: libmpfr-dev and gfortran
bitbake complains about chrpath
It is necessary to install chrpath for bitbake version 1.8.18 !
== Oct 2010 Tested on out of the box x86 "debian lenny" & "ubuntu karmic"
both lenny and karmic say package "apr" not found lenny has python problems that keep bitbake from doing anything except complaining - giving up on lenny for now karmic has gotten past the part that lenny choked on and is compiling - no problems yet