Category talk:Dev: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Is it really a good idea to use abbreviation as lemma titles? For a beginner it would be much easier to understand what a lemma is for if it has a intuitive name. So I suggest to rename this category to '''Developers'''. -- [[User:Sledz|SSZ]] 13:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC) | Is it really a good idea to use abbreviation as lemma titles? For a beginner it would be much easier to understand what a lemma is for if it has a intuitive name. So I suggest to rename this category to '''Developers'''. -- [[User:Sledz|SSZ]] 13:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
: I have no strong opinion on this one. I like short URLs and things which is why I chose what I chose. The most important branch is called org.openembedded.dev, not org.openembedded.development. But feel free to make the changes if you think this would improve the site. | : I have no strong opinion on this one. I like short URLs and things which is why I chose what I chose. The most important branch is called org.openembedded.dev, not org.openembedded.development. But feel free to make the changes if you think this would improve the site. --[[User:Laibsch|Laibsch]] 04:52, 10 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:52, 10 February 2009
Dev vs. Developers
Is it really a good idea to use abbreviation as lemma titles? For a beginner it would be much easier to understand what a lemma is for if it has a intuitive name. So I suggest to rename this category to Developers. -- SSZ 13:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- I have no strong opinion on this one. I like short URLs and things which is why I chose what I chose. The most important branch is called org.openembedded.dev, not org.openembedded.development. But feel free to make the changes if you think this would improve the site. --Laibsch 04:52, 10 February 2009 (UTC)